Book 75: Eragon – Christopher Paolini

Just a warning, this is more of a rant about other readers than a review of the story. It is hard to review a continuous series with very little break in action between books especially if you’ve read them as many times as I have. Let’s just say I’ve loved these novels since I first read them and I’m excited (and sad) for the final novel’s release, but it will be a fitting 50th book this year!

When I went to Goodreads to mark I was re-reading this book, some of the vitriolic responses to the book and the author truly surprised me. It quite upset me how rude and caustic people were being with their claims of copying other stories.

Has Paolini borrowed from other fantasy authors? Yes, but haven’t they all? Is his writing perfect or on par with the HG Wells and JRR Tolkien? No, but what were they doing when they were 19-years old? Does Paolini stretch to far and occasionally end up with awkward dialogue and too much description, yes of course he does – but did you read The Two Towers? I’m fairly certain Tolkien tells you how many leaves are on every bush in the swampland. Is The Inheritance Cycle story worth reading and does he bring something new to the fiction/fantasy genre? Yes.

It is very rare in any genre of literature that an author completely has a never-before heard story (look at religious books – Gilgamesh, the flood in the Bible…). Each story is an authors unique perspective on stories handed down for thousands of generations. Look at most fantasy novels, they can be broken down into any number of archetypes: a search/quest for something, good vs. evil (completely arbitrary most of the time..are you Empire or Rebel?), a repressive regime, a hero/heroine, and battles or wars. Yes Lord of the Rings had some of these, yes Star Wars had some of these, and yes most of the books I read growing up had some of these, but that doesn’t mean he isn’t allowed to use these archetypes or reference them—they’re called archetypes for a reason.

I will openly admit there are occasional instances where, you’re like “gee this is really similar to LotR,” but I don’t see what the big deal is. He took the stories and made them his own (yes he followed in Tolkien’s footsteps and created a language). Yes there was a dragon in The Hobbit, there were humans, dwarves, elves, and even creatures similar to the Urgal’s in the LotR’s universe, but this is where the similarities end. How many people actually read past the first novel (or even the first 200 pages) to find out what happens? Very few would be my guess.

What is most striking and impressive is Paolini had the patience and the ability to write this novel as a 15-year old. I don’t know about the rest of you, but when I was 15 there is now way I could’ve planned out a series and started writing the novels. I just couldn’t have. He’s created memorable characters, he’s woven intricate (if sometimes predictable) plots, he evokes emotions from readers, and perhaps most importantly he has evolved as a writer.

Recommendation: Read it. If you’re skeptical, I suggest you actually read the entire book, or the entire series. You’re either going to have a response to his writing or the plot. But look at it for what it was, a 15 year old’s attempt at creating a world and an epic story. By all means compare him to Tolkien, but keep the age in mind and the fact that Tolkien was 45 when he started LotR. Once you’ve done that then let’s have a conversation about whether he added anything to the stories he supposedly copied. There is nothing more obnoxious to me than someone critiquing a book or a series without having taken the time to finish them.


13 thoughts on “Book 75: Eragon – Christopher Paolini”

  1. I’m impressed. That is quite a feat for a 15 year old. I was writing really really crappy four stanza poetry when I was 15. And I spent a lot of time reading Tolkien. It never occurred to me to write my own epic fantasy.

    It is a lot easier for the majority of people to say something negative than to recognize good qualities and comment on them. So, thanks for sharing that positivity. 🙂


    1. Yeah – I just get so frustrated when people do something like that. It also helps in general I completely delve into a story and ignore a lot of the grammar writing. It’s definitely about the story for me.


      1. See, I’m the opposite. If the grammar/writing is so bad that I feel the need to whip out a red pen, I will chuck the book across the room. It’s why I can’t read Robert Jordan, Terry Goodkind, or Steven Erikson.

        I liked Eragon the first time I read it. I was about 15 at the time, and thought that Arya was badass. Re-reading it, I was unimpressed with the story or writing, and questioned my 15-year-old self’s judgment.


  2. I get the grammar being bad etc, but I guess because of how I read so immersed I overlook it. I’m also looking at the series and not the one story – although apparently I immerse myself enough that I miss most of the complaints everyone seems to have. Maybe I’ll re-read again next year not for the story but for the writing.


  3. Haven’t read the series yet. It might be fun to read with my boys – although none of us has the patience for a read aloud. I’ll read it then the boys will read it. Then we’ll talk about it. That’s how we did Harry Potter, except I was rereading those…


    1. It might actually be better read out loud – it’s very story like, but they are all very long books so I can’t imagine reading them out loud, but I guess that’s why they created books on tape (or one of the reasons) 😀


  4. Someone left Eragon at my place, and I’ve been avoiding reading it due to all the hateful reviews out there. Maybe I’ll give it a go and try to keep an open mind. Sometimes it just becomes trendy to hate on something.


    1. I don’t blame you for avoiding it. I remember reading it because I was so impressed that he was in similar age to myself at the time and able to write a story like that. I feel like most of the negative reviews ignore the story and the characters and instead focus on the writing. By all means look at that, but the strength of the work is in the story he weaves and the characters (not all of them however). I’m just finishing up Brisingr (Book 3) and he irks me a few points because he’s stretching his muscles as a writer and it’s not working well.


Let me know your thoughts!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.